Home/Compare/Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o mini

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o mini

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

GPT-4o mini is cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet at $0.15/1M/1M vs $3.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 20.0x cost difference. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1295). Choose GPT-4o mini for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-4o mini
Input Price / 1M tokens$3.00/1M$0.15/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$15.00/1M$0.60/1MCheaper
Context Window200KLarger128K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1295Smarter1272
Open Source
Free Tier
Release Date2024-062024-07

Which is cheaper: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini is the cheaper option at $0.15/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $3.00/1M for Claude 3.5 Sonnet. That is a 20.0x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Claude 3.5 Sonnet charges $15.00/1M/1M vs $0.60/1M/1M for GPT-4o mini.

Which has better quality: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Claude 3.5 Sonnet achieves a higher ELO score (1295 vs 1272), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels at 200k context window — best for long documents. GPT-4o mini is known for extremely low cost — cheapest flagship-family model.

Which should you choose: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if:
  • 200K context window — best for long documents
  • Industry-leading coding performance
  • Nuanced instruction following
Choose GPT-4o mini if:
  • Extremely low cost — cheapest flagship-family model
  • Fast inference
  • Good at structured data extraction

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 20.0x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1295, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a larger context window at 200K tokens.

Should I choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?

Choose GPT-4o mini if cost is the priority. Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is best for coding and document-analysis, while GPT-4o mini excels at customer-support and data-extraction.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini open source?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is proprietary. GPT-4o mini is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o3 vs GPT-4o mini
DeepSeek R1 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-4o mini
o1 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1 vs GPT-4o mini