Home/Compare/Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.1 70B

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.1 70B

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper than Claude 3 Opus at $0.35/1M/1M vs $15.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 42.9x cost difference. Claude 3 Opus scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1249). Choose Llama 3.1 70B for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Claude 3 Opus for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.1 70B
Input Price / 1M tokens$15.00/1M$0.35/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$75.00/1M$0.40/1MCheaper
Context Window200KLarger131K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1249Smarter1247
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-032024-07

Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is the cheaper option at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $15.00/1M for Claude 3 Opus. That is a 42.9x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M/1M vs $0.40/1M/1M for Llama 3.1 70B.

Which has better quality: Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Claude 3 Opus achieves a higher ELO score (1249 vs 1247), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Claude 3 Opus excels at best claude model for creative writing. Llama 3.1 70B is known for excellent price-to-quality ratio.

Which should you choose: Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Claude 3 Opus if:
  • Best Claude model for creative writing
  • 200K context window
  • Deep, thoughtful long-form analysis
Choose Llama 3.1 70B if:
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Good at coding and instruction following

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 42.9x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1249, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Claude 3 Opus has a larger context window at 200K tokens.

Should I choose Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Llama 3.1 70B if cost is the priority. Choose Claude 3 Opus if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Claude 3 Opus is best for creative-writing and research, while Llama 3.1 70B excels at coding and low-cost.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 70B open source?

Claude 3 Opus is proprietary. Llama 3.1 70B is open source.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Claude 3 Opus
o3 vs Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 vs Claude 3 Opus
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o1 vs Claude 3 Opus
o1 vs Llama 3.1 70B