Home/Compare/Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 nano

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 nano

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $0.20/1M/1M vs $5.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 25.0x cost difference. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1415). Choose GPT-5.4 nano for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Claude Opus 4.7 for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5.4 nano
Input Price / 1M tokens$5.00/1M$0.20/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$25.00/1M$1.25/1MCheaper
Context Window1MLarger272K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1415Smarter1280
Open Source
Free Tier
Release Date2026-042026-03

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano is the cheaper option at $0.20/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.7. That is a 25.0x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M/1M vs $1.25/1M/1M for GPT-5.4 nano.

Which has better quality: Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Claude Opus 4.7 achieves a higher ELO score (1415 vs 1280), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Claude Opus 4.7 excels at step-change improvement in agentic coding over opus 4.6. GPT-5.4 nano is known for cheapest openai model — $0.20/1m input.

Which should you choose: Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if:
  • Step-change improvement in agentic coding over Opus 4.6
  • 1M token context window at standard pricing
  • 128K max output tokens
Choose GPT-5.4 nano if:
  • Cheapest OpenAI model — $0.20/1M input
  • Good at classification, routing, and extraction
  • 272K context window even at low price

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 25.0x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1415, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.7 has a larger context window at 1000K tokens.

Should I choose Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Choose GPT-5.4 nano if cost is the priority. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Claude Opus 4.7 is best for coding and reasoning, while GPT-5.4 nano excels at low-cost and fast-response.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano open source?

Claude Opus 4.7 is proprietary. GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.7
GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.4 nano
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro