Home/Compare/Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $0.15/1M/1M vs $5.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 33.3x cost difference. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1415). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Claude Opus 4.7 for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Llama 4 Maverick
Input Price / 1M tokens$5.00/1M$0.15/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$25.00/1M$0.60/1MCheaper
Context Window1M1M
ELO Score (LMSYS)1415Smarter1350
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2026-042025-04

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper option at $0.15/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.7. That is a 33.3x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M/1M vs $0.60/1M/1M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Which has better quality: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Claude Opus 4.7 achieves a higher ELO score (1415 vs 1350), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Claude Opus 4.7 excels at step-change improvement in agentic coding over opus 4.6. Llama 4 Maverick is known for natively multimodal open-weight flagship.

Which should you choose: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if:
  • Step-change improvement in agentic coding over Opus 4.6
  • 1M token context window at standard pricing
  • 128K max output tokens
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if:
  • Natively multimodal open-weight flagship
  • Competitive with GPT-5.4 mini and Claude Sonnet on many tasks
  • 1M token context window

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper at $0.15/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 33.3x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1415, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick have the same context window.

Should I choose Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost is the priority. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Claude Opus 4.7 is best for coding and reasoning, while Llama 4 Maverick excels at coding and research.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick open source?

Claude Opus 4.7 is proprietary. Llama 4 Maverick is open source.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.7
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro