Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout
Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $0.08/1M/1M vs $5.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 62.5x cost difference. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1415). Choose Llama 4 Scout for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Claude Opus 4.7 for maximum quality.
Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.7. That is a 62.5x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Llama 4 Scout.
Which has better quality: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Claude Opus 4.7 achieves a higher ELO score (1415 vs 1280), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Claude Opus 4.7 excels at step-change improvement in agentic coding over opus 4.6. Llama 4 Scout is known for runs on a single h100 — cheapest self-host target in the llama 4 family.
Which should you choose: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
- → Step-change improvement in agentic coding over Opus 4.6
- → 1M token context window at standard pricing
- → 128K max output tokens
- → Runs on a single H100 — cheapest self-host target in the Llama 4 family
- → 10M token context window — industry-leading for long context
- → Open weights
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 62.5x more affordable.
Which has better quality: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1415, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.
Which has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window at 10000K tokens.
Should I choose Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?
Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost is the priority. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Claude Opus 4.7 is best for coding and reasoning, while Llama 4 Scout excels at long-context and low-cost.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout open source?
Claude Opus 4.7 is proprietary. Llama 4 Scout is open source.