Home/Compare/Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o3-mini

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o3-mini

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated June 2026

Quick Verdict

o3-mini is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $1.10/1M vs $3.00/1M input tokens — a 2.7x cost difference. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1390). Choose o3-mini for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6o3-mini
Input Price / 1M tokens$3.00/1M$1.10/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$15.00/1M$4.40/1MCheaper
Context Window1MLarger200K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1390Smarter1340
Open Source
Free Tier
Release Date2025-102025-01

Which is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

o3-mini is the cheaper option at $1.10/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $3.00/1M for Claude Sonnet 4.6. That is a 2.7x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Claude Sonnet 4.6 charges $15.00/1M vs $4.40/1M for o3-mini.

Which has better quality: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Claude Sonnet 4.6 achieves a higher ELO score (1390 vs 1340), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 excels at best combination of speed and intelligence in the claude family. o3-mini is known for strong reasoning at a low price point.

Which should you choose: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if:
  • Best combination of speed and intelligence in the Claude family
  • 1M token context window at standard pricing
  • Extended thinking and adaptive thinking supported
Choose o3-mini if:
  • Strong reasoning at a low price point
  • 200K context window
  • Three effort levels (low/medium/high) for cost control

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

o3-mini is cheaper at $1.10/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 2.7x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1390, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a larger context window at 1000K tokens.

Should I choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini?

Choose o3-mini if cost is the priority. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is best for coding and function-calling, while o3-mini excels at reasoning and math.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3-mini open source?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is proprietary. o3-mini is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-5.4 vs o3-mini
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3-mini
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs o3-mini