Home/Compare/DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) vs Grok 4.20

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) vs Grok 4.20

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is cheaper than Grok 4.20 at $0.28/1M/1M vs $2.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 7.1x cost difference. DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1385). Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) for cost-sensitive workloads; both are strong choices depending on your budget.

Detailed Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)Grok 4.20
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.28/1MCheaper$2.00/1M
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.42/1MCheaper$6.00/1M
Context Window128K2MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1385Smarter1380
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2025-122026-03

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is the cheaper option at $0.28/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $2.00/1M for Grok 4.20. That is a 7.1x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) charges $0.42/1M/1M vs $6.00/1M/1M for Grok 4.20.

Which has better quality: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) achieves a higher ELO score (1385 vs 1380), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) excels at o-series-class reasoning at a fraction of the price. Grok 4.20 is known for 2m token context window — tied for largest available.

Which should you choose: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) if:
  • o-series-class reasoning at a fraction of the price
  • Up to 64K output tokens for long chain-of-thought
  • Open weights
Choose Grok 4.20 if:
  • 2M token context window — tied for largest available
  • Real-time X (Twitter) data access
  • Strong reasoning and multi-agent variants

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is cheaper at $0.28/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 7.1x more affordable.

Which has better quality: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1385, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

Grok 4.20 has a larger context window at 2000K tokens.

Should I choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20?

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) if cost is the priority. Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is best for reasoning and math, while Grok 4.20 excels at reasoning and research.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Grok 4.20 open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is open source. Grok 4.20 is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)
GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4.20
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.20
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.20