Home/Compare/Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 70B

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 70B

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper than Gemini 1.5 Pro at $0.35/1M/1M vs $1.25/1M/1M input tokens — a 3.6x cost difference. Gemini 1.5 Pro scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1266). Choose Llama 3.1 70B for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Gemini 1.5 Pro for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricGemini 1.5 ProLlama 3.1 70B
Input Price / 1M tokens$1.25/1M$0.35/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$5.00/1M$0.40/1MCheaper
Context Window2MLarger131K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1266Smarter1247
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-022024-07

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is the cheaper option at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $1.25/1M for Gemini 1.5 Pro. That is a 3.6x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Gemini 1.5 Pro charges $5.00/1M/1M vs $0.40/1M/1M for Llama 3.1 70B.

Which has better quality: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Gemini 1.5 Pro achieves a higher ELO score (1266 vs 1247), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Gemini 1.5 Pro excels at 2m token context window — largest available commercially. Llama 3.1 70B is known for excellent price-to-quality ratio.

Which should you choose: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro if:
  • 2M token context window — largest available commercially
  • Strong multimodal capabilities (text, images, video, audio)
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
Choose Llama 3.1 70B if:
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Good at coding and instruction following

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 3.6x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1266, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window at 2000K tokens.

Should I choose Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Llama 3.1 70B if cost is the priority. Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Gemini 1.5 Pro is best for long-context and document-analysis, while Llama 3.1 70B excels at coding and low-cost.

Is Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 70B open source?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is proprietary. Llama 3.1 70B is open source.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro
o3 vs Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o1 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro
o1 vs Llama 3.1 70B