Home/Compare/Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Gemini 1.5 Flash is cheaper than Gemma 2 27B at $0.07/1M/1M vs $0.27/1M/1M input tokens — a 3.6x cost difference. Gemma 2 27B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1220). Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Gemma 2 27B for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricGemma 2 27BGemini 1.5 Flash
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.27/1M$0.07/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.27/1MCheaper$0.30/1M
Context Window8K1MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1220Smarter1211
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-062024-05

Which is cheaper: Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is the cheaper option at $0.07/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $0.27/1M for Gemma 2 27B. That is a 3.6x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Gemma 2 27B charges $0.27/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Which has better quality: Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Gemma 2 27B achieves a higher ELO score (1220 vs 1211), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Gemma 2 27B excels at best open-source model at 27b scale. Gemini 1.5 Flash is known for one of the cheapest high-quality models available.

Which should you choose: Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Choose Gemma 2 27B if:
  • Best open-source model at 27B scale
  • Runs on consumer hardware (RTX 3090)
  • Strong instruction following
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if:
  • One of the cheapest high-quality models available
  • 1M token context window
  • Very fast inference

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.07/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 3.6x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1220, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a larger context window at 1000K tokens.

Should I choose Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if cost is the priority. Choose Gemma 2 27B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Gemma 2 27B is best for coding and summarization, while Gemini 1.5 Flash excels at low-cost and fast-response.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 1.5 Flash open source?

Gemma 2 27B is open source. Gemini 1.5 Flash is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Gemma 2 27B
o3 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemma 2 27B
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash
o1 vs Gemma 2 27B
o1 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash