Home/Compare/Llama 3.1 405B vs Claude 3 Opus

Llama 3.1 405B vs Claude 3 Opus

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper than Claude 3 Opus at $2.70/1M/1M vs $15.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 5.6x cost difference. Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1267). Choose Llama 3.1 405B for cost-sensitive workloads; both are strong choices depending on your budget.

Detailed Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405BClaude 3 Opus
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1MCheaper$15.00/1M
Output Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1MCheaper$75.00/1M
Context Window131K200KLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1267Smarter1249
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-072024-03

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Llama 3.1 405B is the cheaper option at $2.70/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $15.00/1M for Claude 3 Opus. That is a 5.6x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Llama 3.1 405B charges $2.70/1M/1M vs $75.00/1M/1M for Claude 3 Opus.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Llama 3.1 405B achieves a higher ELO score (1267 vs 1249), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Llama 3.1 405B excels at open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy. Claude 3 Opus is known for best claude model for creative writing.

Which should you choose: Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Choose Llama 3.1 405B if:
  • Open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy
  • Competitive with GPT-4o on many benchmarks
  • Strong multilingual capabilities
Choose Claude 3 Opus if:
  • Best Claude model for creative writing
  • 200K context window
  • Deep, thoughtful long-form analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper at $2.70/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 5.6x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1267, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Claude 3 Opus has a larger context window at 200K tokens.

Should I choose Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus?

Choose Llama 3.1 405B if cost is the priority. Choose Llama 3.1 405B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Llama 3.1 405B is best for coding and research, while Claude 3 Opus excels at creative-writing and research.

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Claude 3 Opus open source?

Llama 3.1 405B is open source. Claude 3 Opus is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o3 vs Claude 3 Opus
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
DeepSeek R1 vs Claude 3 Opus
o1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o1 vs Claude 3 Opus