Home/Compare/Llama 3.1 405B vs Command R+

Llama 3.1 405B vs Command R+

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Command R+ is cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B at $2.50/1M/1M vs $2.70/1M/1M input tokens — a 1.1x cost difference. Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1267). Choose Command R+ for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Llama 3.1 405B for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405BCommand R+
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1M$2.50/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1MCheaper$10.00/1M
Context Window131KLarger128K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1267Smarter1230
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-072024-04

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Command R+ is the cheaper option at $2.50/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $2.70/1M for Llama 3.1 405B. That is a 1.1x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Llama 3.1 405B charges $2.70/1M/1M vs $10.00/1M/1M for Command R+.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Llama 3.1 405B achieves a higher ELO score (1267 vs 1230), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Llama 3.1 405B excels at open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy. Command R+ is known for best-in-class retrieval-augmented generation (rag).

Which should you choose: Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Choose Llama 3.1 405B if:
  • Open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy
  • Competitive with GPT-4o on many benchmarks
  • Strong multilingual capabilities
Choose Command R+ if:
  • Best-in-class retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
  • Native document grounding with citations
  • Strong for enterprise knowledge bases

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Command R+ is cheaper at $2.50/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 1.1x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1267, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Llama 3.1 405B has a larger context window at 131K tokens.

Should I choose Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+?

Choose Command R+ if cost is the priority. Choose Llama 3.1 405B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Llama 3.1 405B is best for coding and research, while Command R+ excels at research and document-analysis.

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Command R+ open source?

Llama 3.1 405B is open source. Command R+ is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o3 vs Command R+
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
DeepSeek R1 vs Command R+
o1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o1 vs Command R+