Home/Compare/Llama 3.1 405B vs Gemma 2 27B

Llama 3.1 405B vs Gemma 2 27B

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B at $0.27/1M/1M vs $2.70/1M/1M input tokens — a 10.0x cost difference. Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1267). Choose Gemma 2 27B for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Llama 3.1 405B for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405BGemma 2 27B
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1M$0.27/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1M$0.27/1MCheaper
Context Window131KLarger8K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1267Smarter1220
Open SourceYesYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-072024-06

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is the cheaper option at $0.27/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $2.70/1M for Llama 3.1 405B. That is a 10.0x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Llama 3.1 405B charges $2.70/1M/1M vs $0.27/1M/1M for Gemma 2 27B.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Llama 3.1 405B achieves a higher ELO score (1267 vs 1220), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Llama 3.1 405B excels at open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy. Gemma 2 27B is known for best open-source model at 27b scale.

Which should you choose: Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Choose Llama 3.1 405B if:
  • Open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy
  • Competitive with GPT-4o on many benchmarks
  • Strong multilingual capabilities
Choose Gemma 2 27B if:
  • Best open-source model at 27B scale
  • Runs on consumer hardware (RTX 3090)
  • Strong instruction following

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.27/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 10.0x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1267, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Llama 3.1 405B has a larger context window at 131K tokens.

Should I choose Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B?

Choose Gemma 2 27B if cost is the priority. Choose Llama 3.1 405B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Llama 3.1 405B is best for coding and research, while Gemma 2 27B excels at coding and summarization.

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Gemma 2 27B open source?

Llama 3.1 405B is open source. Gemma 2 27B is open source.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o3 vs Gemma 2 27B
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemma 2 27B
o1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o1 vs Gemma 2 27B