Home/Compare/Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 3.1 70B

Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 3.1 70B

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B at $0.35/1M/1M vs $2.70/1M/1M input tokens — a 7.7x cost difference. Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1267). Choose Llama 3.1 70B for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Llama 3.1 405B for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405BLlama 3.1 70B
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1M$0.35/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$2.70/1M$0.40/1MCheaper
Context Window131K131K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1267Smarter1247
Open SourceYesYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-072024-07

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is the cheaper option at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $2.70/1M for Llama 3.1 405B. That is a 7.7x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Llama 3.1 405B charges $2.70/1M/1M vs $0.40/1M/1M for Llama 3.1 70B.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Llama 3.1 405B achieves a higher ELO score (1267 vs 1247), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Llama 3.1 405B excels at open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy. Llama 3.1 70B is known for excellent price-to-quality ratio.

Which should you choose: Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Llama 3.1 405B if:
  • Open source — can be self-hosted for data privacy
  • Competitive with GPT-4o on many benchmarks
  • Strong multilingual capabilities
Choose Llama 3.1 70B if:
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Good at coding and instruction following

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 7.7x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 405B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1267, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Both Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 3.1 70B have the same context window.

Should I choose Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Llama 3.1 70B if cost is the priority. Choose Llama 3.1 405B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Llama 3.1 405B is best for coding and research, while Llama 3.1 70B excels at coding and low-cost.

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 70B open source?

Llama 3.1 405B is open source. Llama 3.1 70B is open source.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o3 vs Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o1 vs Llama 3.1 405B
o1 vs Llama 3.1 70B