Home/Compare/Llama 3.1 70B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash

Llama 3.1 70B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Gemini 1.5 Flash is cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B at $0.07/1M/1M vs $0.35/1M/1M input tokens — a 4.7x cost difference. Llama 3.1 70B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1247). Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Llama 3.1 70B for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 70BGemini 1.5 Flash
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.35/1M$0.07/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.40/1M$0.30/1MCheaper
Context Window131K1MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1247Smarter1211
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-072024-05

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is the cheaper option at $0.07/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $0.35/1M for Llama 3.1 70B. That is a 4.7x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Llama 3.1 70B charges $0.40/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Llama 3.1 70B achieves a higher ELO score (1247 vs 1211), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Llama 3.1 70B excels at excellent price-to-quality ratio. Gemini 1.5 Flash is known for one of the cheapest high-quality models available.

Which should you choose: Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Choose Llama 3.1 70B if:
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Good at coding and instruction following
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if:
  • One of the cheapest high-quality models available
  • 1M token context window
  • Very fast inference

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.07/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 4.7x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Llama 3.1 70B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1247, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a larger context window at 1000K tokens.

Should I choose Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash?

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if cost is the priority. Choose Llama 3.1 70B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Llama 3.1 70B is best for coding and low-cost, while Gemini 1.5 Flash excels at low-cost and fast-response.

Is Llama 3.1 70B or Gemini 1.5 Flash open source?

Llama 3.1 70B is open source. Gemini 1.5 Flash is proprietary.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o3 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash
o1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o1 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash