Home/Compare/Qwen 2.5 72B vs Llama 3.1 70B

Qwen 2.5 72B vs Llama 3.1 70B

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M/1M vs $0.35/1M/1M input tokens. Qwen 2.5 72B scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1280). Choose Llama 3.1 70B for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Qwen 2.5 72B for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricQwen 2.5 72BLlama 3.1 70B
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.35/1M$0.35/1M
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.40/1M$0.40/1M
Context Window131K131K
ELO Score (LMSYS)1280Smarter1247
Open SourceYesYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-092024-07

Which is cheaper: Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Qwen 2.5 72B and Llama 3.1 70B are identically priced at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Qwen 2.5 72B charges $0.40/1M/1M vs $0.40/1M/1M for Llama 3.1 70B.

Which has better quality: Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Qwen 2.5 72B achieves a higher ELO score (1280 vs 1247), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Qwen 2.5 72B excels at best-in-class for chinese/japanese/korean languages. Llama 3.1 70B is known for excellent price-to-quality ratio.

Which should you choose: Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Qwen 2.5 72B if:
  • Best-in-class for Chinese/Japanese/Korean languages
  • Open source weights available
  • Strong coding performance for cost
Choose Llama 3.1 70B if:
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Good at coding and instruction following

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Qwen 2.5 72B and Llama 3.1 70B have the same input price of $0.35/1M per 1M tokens.

Which has better quality: Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Qwen 2.5 72B scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1280, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Both Qwen 2.5 72B and Llama 3.1 70B have the same context window.

Should I choose Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Llama 3.1 70B if cost is the priority. Choose Qwen 2.5 72B if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Qwen 2.5 72B is best for translation and coding, while Llama 3.1 70B excels at coding and low-cost.

Is Qwen 2.5 72B or Llama 3.1 70B open source?

Qwen 2.5 72B is open source. Llama 3.1 70B is open source.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs Qwen 2.5 72B
o3 vs Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 2.5 72B
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o1 vs Qwen 2.5 72B
o1 vs Llama 3.1 70B