Home/Compare/DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) vs Llama 4 Scout

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) at $0.08/1M/1M vs $0.28/1M/1M input tokens — a 3.5x cost difference. DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1385). Choose Llama 4 Scout for cost-sensitive workloads; choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)Llama 4 Scout
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.28/1M$0.08/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.42/1M$0.30/1MCheaper
Context Window128K10MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1385Smarter1280
Open SourceYesYes
Free Tier
Release Date2025-122025-04

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $0.28/1M for DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner). That is a 3.5x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) charges $0.42/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Llama 4 Scout.

Which has better quality: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) achieves a higher ELO score (1385 vs 1280), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) excels at o-series-class reasoning at a fraction of the price. Llama 4 Scout is known for runs on a single h100 — cheapest self-host target in the llama 4 family.

Which should you choose: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) if:
  • o-series-class reasoning at a fraction of the price
  • Up to 64K output tokens for long chain-of-thought
  • Open weights
Choose Llama 4 Scout if:
  • Runs on a single H100 — cheapest self-host target in the Llama 4 family
  • 10M token context window — industry-leading for long context
  • Open weights

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 3.5x more affordable.

Which has better quality: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1385, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window at 10000K tokens.

Should I choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost is the priority. Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is best for reasoning and math, while Llama 4 Scout excels at long-context and low-cost.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) or Llama 4 Scout open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner) is open source. Llama 4 Scout is open source.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Scout
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoner)
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout