Home/Compare/Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro at $0.15/1M/1M vs $1.25/1M/1M input tokens — a 8.3x cost difference. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1385). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Gemini 2.5 Pro for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProLlama 4 Maverick
Input Price / 1M tokens$1.25/1M$0.15/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$10.00/1M$0.60/1MCheaper
Context Window2MLarger1M
ELO Score (LMSYS)1385Smarter1350
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2025-062025-04

Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper option at $0.15/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $1.25/1M for Gemini 2.5 Pro. That is a 8.3x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Gemini 2.5 Pro charges $10.00/1M/1M vs $0.60/1M/1M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Which has better quality: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Gemini 2.5 Pro achieves a higher ELO score (1385 vs 1350), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Gemini 2.5 Pro excels at 2m token context window — among the largest available. Llama 4 Maverick is known for natively multimodal open-weight flagship.

Which should you choose: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if:
  • 2M token context window — among the largest available
  • Strong multimodal reasoning across text, video, and audio
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio vs. flagships
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if:
  • Natively multimodal open-weight flagship
  • Competitive with GPT-5.4 mini and Claude Sonnet on many tasks
  • 1M token context window

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper at $0.15/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 8.3x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1385, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a larger context window at 2000K tokens.

Should I choose Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost is the priority. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Gemini 2.5 Pro is best for long-context and document-analysis, while Llama 4 Maverick excels at coding and research.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick open source?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary. Llama 4 Maverick is open source.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick