Home/Compare/GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 70B

GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 70B

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper than GPT-4o at $0.35/1M/1M vs $2.50/1M/1M input tokens — a 7.1x cost difference. GPT-4o scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1286). Choose Llama 3.1 70B for cost-sensitive workloads; choose GPT-4o for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricGPT-4oLlama 3.1 70B
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.50/1M$0.35/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$10.00/1M$0.40/1MCheaper
Context Window128K131KLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1286Smarter1247
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2024-052024-07

Which is cheaper: GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is the cheaper option at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $2.50/1M for GPT-4o. That is a 7.1x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: GPT-4o charges $10.00/1M/1M vs $0.40/1M/1M for Llama 3.1 70B.

Which has better quality: GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, GPT-4o achieves a higher ELO score (1286 vs 1247), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. GPT-4o excels at multimodal: handles text, images, and audio natively. Llama 3.1 70B is known for excellent price-to-quality ratio.

Which should you choose: GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose GPT-4o if:
  • Multimodal: handles text, images, and audio natively
  • Strong reasoning and instruction following
  • Excellent coding capabilities
Choose Llama 3.1 70B if:
  • Excellent price-to-quality ratio
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Good at coding and instruction following

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper at $0.35/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 7.1x more affordable.

Which has better quality: GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

GPT-4o scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1286, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B has a larger context window at 131K tokens.

Should I choose GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B?

Choose Llama 3.1 70B if cost is the priority. Choose GPT-4o if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: GPT-4o is best for coding and image-understanding, while Llama 3.1 70B excels at coding and low-cost.

Is GPT-4o or Llama 3.1 70B open source?

GPT-4o is proprietary. Llama 3.1 70B is open source.

Related Comparisons

o3 vs GPT-4o
o3 vs Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
o1 vs GPT-4o
o1 vs Llama 3.1 70B