Home/Compare/Grok 4.1 Fast vs Llama 4 Scout

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Grok 4.1 Fast at $0.08/1M/1M vs $0.20/1M/1M input tokens — a 2.5x cost difference. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1305). Choose Llama 4 Scout for cost-sensitive workloads; choose Grok 4.1 Fast for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

MetricGrok 4.1 FastLlama 4 Scout
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.20/1M$0.08/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.50/1M$0.30/1MCheaper
Context Window2M10MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1305Smarter1280
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2026-012025-04

Which is cheaper: Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $0.20/1M for Grok 4.1 Fast. That is a 2.5x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: Grok 4.1 Fast charges $0.50/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Llama 4 Scout.

Which has better quality: Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, Grok 4.1 Fast achieves a higher ELO score (1305 vs 1280), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. Grok 4.1 Fast excels at 2m token context at $0.20/$0.50 per 1m — unbeatable for long context. Llama 4 Scout is known for runs on a single h100 — cheapest self-host target in the llama 4 family.

Which should you choose: Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast if:
  • 2M token context at $0.20/$0.50 per 1M — unbeatable for long context
  • Very fast inference
  • Real-time X data access
Choose Llama 4 Scout if:
  • Runs on a single H100 — cheapest self-host target in the Llama 4 family
  • 10M token context window — industry-leading for long context
  • Open weights

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 2.5x more affordable.

Which has better quality: Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1305, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window at 10000K tokens.

Should I choose Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost is the priority. Choose Grok 4.1 Fast if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: Grok 4.1 Fast is best for long-context and low-cost, while Llama 4 Scout excels at long-context and low-cost.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout open source?

Grok 4.1 Fast is proprietary. Llama 4 Scout is open source.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4.1 Fast
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Scout
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout