Home/Compare/o3 vs Llama 4 Scout

o3 vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than o3 at $0.08/1M/1M vs $2.00/1M/1M input tokens — a 25.0x cost difference. o3 scores higher on quality benchmarks (ELO 1395). Choose Llama 4 Scout for cost-sensitive workloads; choose o3 for maximum quality.

Detailed Comparison

Metrico3Llama 4 Scout
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.00/1M$0.08/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$8.00/1M$0.30/1MCheaper
Context Window200K10MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)1395Smarter1280
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2025-042025-04

Which is cheaper: o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $2.00/1M for o3. That is a 25.0x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: o3 charges $8.00/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Llama 4 Scout.

Which has better quality: o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, o3 achieves a higher ELO score (1395 vs 1280), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. o3 excels at top-tier reasoning on math, science, and agentic tasks. Llama 4 Scout is known for runs on a single h100 — cheapest self-host target in the llama 4 family.

Which should you choose: o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose o3 if:
  • Top-tier reasoning on math, science, and agentic tasks
  • 87% cheaper than original o1 at the same capability tier
  • 200K context window
Choose Llama 4 Scout if:
  • Runs on a single H100 — cheapest self-host target in the Llama 4 family
  • 10M token context window — industry-leading for long context
  • Open weights

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 25.0x more affordable.

Which has better quality: o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

o3 scores higher on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena with an ELO of 1395, suggesting better overall quality for most tasks.

Which has a larger context window: o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window at 10000K tokens.

Should I choose o3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost is the priority. Choose o3 if benchmark quality is most important. Consider your specific use case: o3 is best for reasoning and math, while Llama 4 Scout excels at long-context and low-cost.

Is o3 or Llama 4 Scout open source?

o3 is proprietary. Llama 4 Scout is open source.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs o3
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Scout
Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs o3
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout