Home/Compare/GPT-5.4 nano vs Llama 4 Scout

GPT-5.4 nano vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing, context window, and benchmark comparison · Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than GPT-5.4 nano at $0.08/1M/1M vs $0.20/1M/1M input tokens — a 2.5x cost difference. Both models have comparable benchmark scores. Choose Llama 4 Scout for cost-sensitive workloads; both are strong choices depending on your budget.

Detailed Comparison

MetricGPT-5.4 nanoLlama 4 Scout
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.20/1M$0.08/1MCheaper
Output Price / 1M tokens$1.25/1M$0.30/1MCheaper
Context Window272K10MLarger
ELO Score (LMSYS)12801280
Open SourceYes
Free Tier
Release Date2026-032025-04

Which is cheaper: GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, compared to $0.20/1M for GPT-5.4 nano. That is a 2.5x cost difference on input tokens. Output pricing follows a similar pattern: GPT-5.4 nano charges $1.25/1M/1M vs $0.30/1M/1M for Llama 4 Scout.

Which has better quality: GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Based on LMSYS Chatbot Arena rankings, GPT-5.4 nano achieves a higher ELO score (1280 vs 1280), suggesting stronger performance on open-ended tasks. GPT-5.4 nano excels at cheapest openai model — $0.20/1m input. Llama 4 Scout is known for runs on a single h100 — cheapest self-host target in the llama 4 family.

Which should you choose: GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose GPT-5.4 nano if:
  • Cheapest OpenAI model — $0.20/1M input
  • Good at classification, routing, and extraction
  • 272K context window even at low price
Choose Llama 4 Scout if:
  • Runs on a single H100 — cheapest self-host target in the Llama 4 family
  • 10M token context window — industry-leading for long context
  • Open weights

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.08/1M per 1M input tokens, making it 2.5x more affordable.

Which has better quality: GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Both models have similar quality rankings on available benchmarks.

Which has a larger context window: GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window at 10000K tokens.

Should I choose GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost is the priority. Consider your specific use case: GPT-5.4 nano is best for low-cost and fast-response, while Llama 4 Scout excels at long-context and low-cost.

Is GPT-5.4 nano or Llama 4 Scout open source?

GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary. Llama 4 Scout is open source.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.4 nano
GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Scout
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 nano
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4 nano
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout